How do you deal with nuclear anxiety? We ask an expert | Social trends

0

IIf the news about Ukraine has left you sad and scared, you are not alone. So-called “nuclear anxiety” has been around since World War II – from the late 1950s (when the threat was so great that Kellogg’s donated “atomic submarines” in Corn Flakes) to he five years ago when North Korea began testing missiles. . Can the past show us how to deal with it today? I asked historian Taras Young, author of Apocalypse Ready, which explores how governments ask citizens to deal with disasters.

I already feel better just talking to you, because it gives me perspective: we’ve been there before, we can get over it.
People fall into one of two camps. Either they grew up thinking about it, worrying about it, or they just ignored it. My parents never seemed to worry. So it’s up to the individual.

The thing is, we still don’t know what is the balance of nuclear anxiety. A Finnish study found teenagers who worried about the Gulf the war were more prone to depression later. But another study said it was the level of worry that mattered, and that a little worry was normal and had no lasting effect.
The Home Office commissioned a report in 1981, which is one of the few times the government looked at the psychological side of things. He said when you imagine people panicking, you imagine cars queuing to get out of town. It’s not panic. It’s a rational response, because you’re trying to distance yourself from the threat.

Sign up for our Inside Saturday newsletter for an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at the making of the magazine’s biggest stories, plus a curated list of our weekly highlights.

So wait, the are people trying to book bomb shelters right now just being rational? Not surprising Greater Manchester the council advised people in the 80s to cope with anxiety by discussing how life might change after the apocalypse during a game of cards.
This would be good advice if the bomb was about to drop but there was no imminent threat. Panic sets in when people don’t have enough information, but also when there is too much. The location of the bunkers is probably towards the end “too much information”.

But in our 24-hour news cycle, it’s hard to avoid too much information.
Mainlining news all day is very bad for you.

So true. But short of ignore everything, I don’t know how anyone could avoid feeling shaken.
According to this 1981 Home Office report, the only people who would not be affected would be the 1% he estimated to be psychopaths, who were generally thought to be intelligent and rational. The author of this report has separately stated that psychopaths could be the people who could take charge after a nuclear disaster.

The home office see the benefits of being emotionless explains a lot about his current position on refugees. But I’ve always been a believing in the power of unfettered joy in times of anguish. And don’t forget the meditation. I have a theory that one of the reasons oriental practices have exploded recently due to tricks like war anxiety and climate catastrophe.
The same thing happened in the 60s. And in the 80s: when people started to realize the futility of nuclear war, there was a culturally amusing response – satire, music, Frankie Goes to Hollywood, that sort of thing.

So what you say is history wants me to do yoga and then go to the clubs? Well who am I to argue? Thanks Taras, it’s good to understand that a little worry is not something to worry about.
Well done, Coco.


Source link

Share.

Comments are closed.